linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: Add a driver for Loongson TPM device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c7982a4-a8bd-77fd-86b3-ed2d2451ed0a@loongson.cn>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:12:27 +0800
From: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.cn>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
 peterhuewe@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...pe.ca, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
 Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: Add a driver for Loongson TPM device


在 2025/2/14 上午6:10, Jarkko Sakkinen 写道:
>>>> for it.
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>>    MAINTAINERS                 |   1 +
>>>>    drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig    |   9 ++++
>>>>    drivers/char/tpm/Makefile   |   1 +
>>>>    drivers/char/tpm/tpm_lsse.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    4 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_lsse.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> index 6493d58436..6aad0f08ad 100644
>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@ -13484,6 +13484,7 @@ LOONGSON CRYPTO DRIVER
>>>>    M:	Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@...ngson.com>
>>>>    L:	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
>>>>    S:	Maintained
>>>> +F:	drivers/char/tpm/tpm_lsse.c
>>>>    F:	drivers/crypto/loongson/
>>>>    LOONGSON-2 APB DMA DRIVER
>>> Probably MAINTAINERS update should be a separate patch.
>> Some  MAINTAINERS updates are not  separated form the driver patch.  Like
>> the submit of "drivers/mfd/max7714*".
>>
>> So it seems whether the updates to MAINTAINERS  are separated or not is OK.
> I'd prefer them separated from code changes. They are separate tasks
> per se.

OK, thanks.

BR, Qunqin.

>
> BR, Jarkko