[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874j0w3fh1.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 12:58:34 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Eugenio PĂ©rez
<eperezma@...hat.com>, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@...hat.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anton Yakovlev
<anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_snd.h: clarify that `controls` depends on VIRTIO_SND_F_CTLS
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:18:25 +0100,
Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> As defined in the specification, the `controls` field in the configuration
> space is only valid/present if VIRTIO_SND_F_CTLS is negotiated.
>
> From https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.3/virtio-v1.3.html:
>
> 5.14.4 Device Configuration Layout
> ...
> controls
> (driver-read-only) indicates a total number of all available control
> elements if VIRTIO_SND_F_CTLS has been negotiated.
>
> Let's use the same style used in virtio_blk.h to clarify this and to avoid
> confusion as happened in QEMU (see link).
>
> Link: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2805
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Applied now. Thanks.
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists