[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsVFoLTXYBqpeUN1VUTwy5kXTB82fztK62fMPR6tYxChA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:59:40 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
broonie@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Long Li <leo.lilong@...wei.com>,
Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/422] 6.12.14-rc1 review
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 20:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.14 release.
> > There are 422 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:23:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.14-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on the arm64, powerpc builds failed with gcc-8/13 and clang
> on the Linux stable-rc 6.12.14-rc1.
>
> Build regression: arm, powerpc, fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c too few arguments
>
> Good: v6.12.13
> Bad: 6.12.14-rc1 (v6.12.13-423-gfb9a4bb2450b)
Anders bisected this to,
# first bad commit:
[91717e464c5939f7d01ca64742f773a75b319981]
xfs: don't lose solo dquot update transactions
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists