linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] thermal: qcom-spmi-temp-alarm: Add temp alarm data struct based on HW subtype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202502142142.SOgv2k2t-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 21:18:04 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Anjelique Melendez <anjelique.melendez@....qualcomm.com>,
	amitk@...nel.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com, rafael@...nel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
	david.collins@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] thermal: qcom-spmi-temp-alarm: Add temp alarm data
 struct based on HW subtype

Hi Anjelique,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/thermal]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.14-rc2 next-20250214]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anjelique-Melendez/thermal-qcom-spmi-temp-alarm-enable-stage-2-shutdown-when-required/20250214-050700
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git thermal
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213210403.3396392-3-anjelique.melendez%40oss.qualcomm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] thermal: qcom-spmi-temp-alarm: Add temp alarm data struct based on HW subtype
config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250214/202502142142.SOgv2k2t-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250214/202502142142.SOgv2k2t-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502142142.SOgv2k2t-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c:161: warning: expecting prototype for qpnp_tm_get_gen2_temp_stage(). Prototype was for qpnp_tm_gen2_get_temp_stage() instead


vim +161 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c

   153	
   154	/**
   155	 * qpnp_tm_get_gen2_temp_stage() - return over-temperature stage
   156	 * @chip:		Pointer to the qpnp_tm chip
   157	 *
   158	 * Return: stage on success, or errno on failure.
   159	 */
   160	static int qpnp_tm_gen2_get_temp_stage(struct qpnp_tm_chip *chip)
 > 161	{
   162		u8 reg = 0;
   163		int ret;
   164	
   165		ret = qpnp_tm_read(chip, QPNP_TM_REG_STATUS, &reg);
   166		if (ret < 0)
   167			return ret;
   168	
   169		ret = FIELD_GET(STATUS_GEN2_STATE_MASK, reg);
   170	
   171		return alarm_state_map[ret];
   172	}
   173	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki