[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214135911.2037402-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:59:09 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] posix-timers: Reduce spinlock contention
We had incidents involving gazillions of concurrent posix timers.
Benjamin Segall is planning to add a cond_resched() in exit_itimers()
In this small series, I am reducing hash_lock contention in posix_timer_add()
Eric Dumazet (2):
posix-timers: Make next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t
posix-timers: Use RCU in posix_timer_add()
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 +-
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists