lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250216144436.70ff78c3@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 14:44:36 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding
 <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Javier
 Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, Matti Vaittinen
 <mazziesaccount@...il.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Emil Gedenryd
 <emil.gedenryd@...s.com>, Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@...tec.com>, Mudit
 Sharma <muditsharma.info@...il.com>, Per-Daniel Olsson
 <perdaniel.olsson@...s.com>, Subhajit Ghosh
 <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>, Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: light: Add support for AL3000a illuminance
 sensor


> > > +
> > > +static int al3000a_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > > +                         struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
> > > +                         int *val2, long mask)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct al3000a_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > +     int ret, gain;
> > > +
> > > +     switch (mask) {
> > > +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > > +             ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, AL3000A_REG_DATA, &gain);
> > > +             if (ret < 0)
> > > +                     return ret;
> > > +
> > > +             *val = lux_table[gain & AL3000A_GAIN_MASK];  
> >
> > Why did you chosen to do post-processing in the RAW channel instead
> > doing it in INFO_SCALE (same as al3010 does)?
> >  
> 
> From my observation INFO_SCALE will just perform multiplication of RAW
> to SCALE. In this case values which are read are not actual raw values
> of illumination. Next is my assumption (since there is no datasheet),
> but values obtained from register are similar to values from adc
> thermal sensors, they need be converted via reference table to get
> actual data.

Please add a comment somewhere here to say that we don't know the
relationship of these values to illuminance hence providing
_RAW and _SCALE would not be helpful.

> 
> > Except this, LGTM.
> >
> > Documentation and DT patch:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>  
> > > +
> > > +             return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > > +             *val = 1;
> > > +

Don't do this.  The above lack of known relationship has to be
expressed by not providing the _scale attribute.

> > > +             return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > +     default:
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +     }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct iio_info al3000a_info = {
> > > +     .read_raw       = al3000a_read_raw,
> > > +};



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ