[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7IIht2Q-iXEFw7x@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:47:18 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@....nxp.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com>,
Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Joe Hattori <joe@...is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net: stmmac: Add glue layer for Sophgo
SG2044 SoC
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 08:39:51PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> +static void sophgo_dwmac_fix_mac_speed(void *priv, unsigned int speed, unsigned int mode)
> +{
> + struct sophgo_dwmac *dwmac = priv;
> + long rate;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rate = rgmii_clock(speed);
> + if (rate < 0) {
> + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "invalid speed %u\n", speed);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(dwmac->clk_tx, rate);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "failed to set tx rate %ld: %pe\n",
> + rate, ERR_PTR(ret));
> +}
There are a bunch of other platform support in stmmac that are doing
the same:
dwmac-s32.c is virtually identical
dwmac-imx.c does the same, although has some pre-conditions
dwmac-dwc-qos-eth.c is virually identical but the two steps are split
across a bunch of register writes
dwmac-starfive.c looks the same
dwmac-rk.c also
dwmac-intel-plat.c also
So, I wonder whether either this should be a helper, or whether core
code should be doing this. Maybe something to look at as a part of
this patch submission?
We really need to stop writing the same code in different ways and
think more about how to reuse the code that's already present!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists