| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4482b900-2ec0-44c1-9b68-3b403a1df7d8@quicinc.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:58:41 +0530
From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
"Mike
Tipton" <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>,
Jeff Johnson
<quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Sibi
Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/7] interconnect: qcom: Add multidev EPSS L3 support
On 2/10/2025 4:27 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:27:39PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>> EPSS on SA8775P has two instances, necessitating the creation of two
>> device nodes with different compatibles due to the unique ICC node ID
>> and name limitations in the interconnect framework. Add multidevice
>> support for the OSM-L3 provider to dynamically obtain unique node IDs
>> and register with the framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
>> index 6a656ed44d49..da2d82700b5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> /*
>> * Copyright (c) 2020-2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2025 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/args.h>
>> @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
>> #define EPSS_REG_PERF_STATE 0x320
>>
>> #define OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS 1
>> +#define ALLOC_DYN_ID -1
>
> This should be defined by ICC framework.
ok, I will move this to framework.
>
>>
>> #define to_osm_l3_provider(_provider) \
>> container_of(_provider, struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider, provider)
>> @@ -55,46 +57,40 @@ struct qcom_osm_l3_icc_provider {
>> */
>> struct qcom_osm_l3_node {
>> const char *name;
>> - u16 links[OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS];
>> - u16 id;
>> + struct qcom_osm_l3_node *links[OSM_L3_MAX_LINKS];
>> + int id;
>> u16 num_links;
>> u16 buswidth;
>> };
>>
>> struct qcom_osm_l3_desc {
>> - const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const *nodes;
>> + struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const *nodes;
>> size_t num_nodes;
>> unsigned int lut_row_size;
>> unsigned int reg_freq_lut;
>> unsigned int reg_perf_state;
>> };
>>
>> -enum {
>> - OSM_L3_MASTER_NODE = 10000,
>> - OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE,
>> -};
>> -
>> -#define DEFINE_QNODE(_name, _id, _buswidth, ...) \
>> - static const struct qcom_osm_l3_node _name = { \
>> +#define DEFINE_QNODE(_name, _buswidth, ...) \
>> + static struct qcom_osm_l3_node _name = { \
>> .name = #_name, \
>> - .id = _id, \
>> .buswidth = _buswidth, \
>> .num_links = COUNT_ARGS(__VA_ARGS__), \
>> .links = { __VA_ARGS__ }, \
>> }
>>
>> -DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_master, OSM_L3_MASTER_NODE, 16, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE);
>> -DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_slave, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE, 16);
>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_slave, 16);
>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_master, 16, &osm_l3_slave);
>>
>> -static const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const osm_l3_nodes[] = {
>> +static struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const osm_l3_nodes[] = {
>> [MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS] = &osm_l3_master,
>> [SLAVE_OSM_L3] = &osm_l3_slave,
>> };
>>
>> -DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_master, OSM_L3_MASTER_NODE, 32, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE);
>> -DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_slave, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE, 32);
>> +DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_slave, 32);
>> +DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_master, 32, &epss_l3_slave);
>>
>> -static const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const epss_l3_nodes[] = {
>> +static struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const epss_l3_nodes[] = {
>> [MASTER_EPSS_L3_APPS] = &epss_l3_master,
>> [SLAVE_EPSS_L3_SHARED] = &epss_l3_slave,
>> };
>> @@ -164,7 +160,7 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> const struct qcom_osm_l3_desc *desc;
>> struct icc_onecell_data *data;
>> struct icc_provider *provider;
>> - const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const *qnodes;
>> + struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const *qnodes;
>> struct icc_node *node;
>> size_t num_nodes;
>> struct clk *clk;
>> @@ -242,6 +238,10 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> icc_provider_init(provider);
>>
>> + /*Initialize IDs to ALLOC_DYN_ID to indicate dynamic id allocation*/
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++)
>> + qnodes[i]->id = ALLOC_DYN_ID;
>
> This can be initialized statically.
There are two instances of EPSS L3 and the target specific compatible
data is global which requires resetting the IDs for the second instance
probe. If we don't the reset the IDs back to ALLOC_DYN_ID, then ICC
framework assumes that ID has been already allocated and doesn't create
the new ICC nodes for the second instance.
>
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < num_nodes; i++) {
>> size_t j;
>>
>> @@ -250,14 +250,19 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ret = PTR_ERR(node);
>> goto err;
>> }
>> + qnodes[i]->id = node->id;
>
> Should not be necessary.
This is required, each qnode corresponds to a ICC node in framework and
some nodes get created in icc_node_create() API and some in
icc_link_create() API, to have a track of node creation qnode->id is
used, hence initializing qnode->id with id allocated during icc node
creation and avoid creation of duplicate nodes.
>
>>
>> node->name = qnodes[i]->name;
>> /* Cast away const and add it back in qcom_osm_l3_set() */
>> node->data = (void *)qnodes[i];
>> icc_node_add(node, provider);
>>
>> - for (j = 0; j < qnodes[i]->num_links; j++)
>> - icc_link_create(node, qnodes[i]->links[j]);
>> + for (j = 0; j < qnodes[i]->num_links; j++) {
>> + struct qcom_osm_l3_node *link_node = qnodes[i]->links[j];
>> +
>> + icc_link_create(node, link_node->id);
>
> Please add icc_link_nodes() (or something like that), taking two struct
> icc_node instances. Then you can use it here, instead of reading back
> the ID. Ideally the 'ID' should become an internal detail which is of no
> concern for the ICC drivers.
>
Instead of reading back the link node id from the framework, I will call
icc_node_create before calling the icc_link_create() API and assign the
allocated id to respective qnode in the following way:
struct qcom_osm_l3_node *qn_link_node = qnodes[i]->links[j];
struct icc_node *link_node = icc_node_create(qnodes[i]->links[j]->id);
qn_link_node->id = link_node->id;
icc_link_create(node, link_node->id);
This looks cleaner than reading back the id.
>> + link_node->id = (node->links[node->num_links - 1])->id;
>> + }
>>
>> data->nodes[i] = node;
>> }
>> @@ -278,6 +283,7 @@ static int qcom_osm_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_l3_vote },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 },
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists