lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250217150739.JyUlaKxI@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 16:07:39 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/10] locking/local_lock: Introduce
 localtry_lock_t

On 2025-02-17 15:35:11 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > spin_trylock() is not safe due to explicit locking in the underneath
> > rt_spin_trylock() implementation. Removing this explicit locking and
> > attempting only "trylock" is undesired due to PI implications.
> 
> Just to be sure, you're suggesting how to reword that sentence in the
> changelog to make it more precise right?

Yes, just a reword. Everything else is fine by me. It just feels odd ack
my own patch.

> Alexei will you incorporate that in your version?
> 
> >> Note there is no need to use local_inc for acquired variable,
> >> since it's a percpu variable with strict nesting scopes.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > 
> > Other than that, thank you two ;)
> 
> Thank you too :)
> 
> Do you agree with my fixups and addition here?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/efc30cf9-8351-4889-8245-cc4a6893ebf4@suse.cz/

Yes, looks good.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ