[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db3af9b9-37b9-4a29-a480-ddb1df497530@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 16:25:11 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
git@...inx.com, Anand Ashok Dumbre <anand.ashok.dumbre@...inx.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Mubin Sayyed <mubin.sayyed@....com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM"
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)"
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:XILINX AMS DRIVER" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: zynqmp: Move firmware constants from binding
to platform
On 2/4/25 20:43, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Based on discussion done long time ago
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/5353872c-56a3-98f9-7f22-ec1f6c2ccdc8@linaro.org/
>> it is better to deprecate firmware contants which are not used in any code
>> and it's only purpose is to use macros in dt files.
>>
>> There is no reason to be the part of dt bindings but it should be kept
>> there with adding deprecated warning.
>>
>> I want to see if this is the right way to go. If yes, I will also do the
>> same changes in other headers which contain only constans which are not
>> used in any code.
>
> Ye, I think this is a good approach to take.
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Any other comment?
M
Powered by blists - more mailing lists