linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arch_topology: init capacity_freq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7NdT2OBJPRveDHQ@bogus>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 16:01:19 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	<beata.michalska@....com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
	<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	<pierre.gondois@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch_topology: init capacity_freq_ref to 0

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 03:01:23PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I just wanted to mention that this patch still applies cleanly on
> next-20250217 as well, and it still builds/boots/works as expected.
> 
> I've rechecked it given that the patches at [1] seem ready to be picked
> up, and those patches depend on this one.
>

Is there a dependency on [1] ?

Either way, if Catalin is happy to pick it up along with [1], that would
be best and easiest.

If not and there are not dependencies, then we can ask Greg to pick up.
Which means you need to repost with him cc-ed ? Lets wait and see if
Catalin is happy to pick up before reposting though.

--
Regards,
Sudeep