linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <92da3765-def8-4164-b667-8caaba01706c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:04:17 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Cc: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
 Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>,
 "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing
 policies

On 2/17/2025 05:38, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:52:36PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>>
>> If a CPU is missing a policy then the unit test is skipped for the rest
>> of the CPUs on the system.
>>
>> Instead just skip the rest of that test and continue to test the rest
>> of them.
> 
> Along with this change, does it make sense to only loop over the
> online CPUs instead of possible CPUs ?
> 
> 

Sure thing.  Will change this patch for v3.

Thanks!