[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4966939.GXAFRqVoOG@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:12:34 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] PM: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND conditionally
Hi Everyone,
This is a follow-up for the discussion on the patchset at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2314745.iZASKD2KPV@rjwysocki.net/
that suggested an adjustment of the approach.
Accordingly, this series modifies the PM core and the users of
DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND to take it into account only if it is
consistently used in dependency graphs, as described in the
changelog of patch [3/3].
Patches [1-2/3] are preparatory and they arrange for the handling
of devices with no runtime PM support in a meaningful way.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists