linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: KVM: Add support for SRSO_MSR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7LNjEqZELrPmRkV@Asmaa.>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:47:56 -0800
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <derkling@...gle.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick Bellasi <derkling@...bug.net>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: KVM: Add support for SRSO_MSR_FIX

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 12:57:07AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > Should this patch (and the two previously merged patches) be backported
> > to stable? I noticed they did not have CC:stable.
> 
> Because a stable backport would require manual backporting, depending on where
> it goes. And Brendan, Patrick or I are willing to do that - it's a question of
> who gets there first. :-)

Thanks for the context, didn't realize a manual backport was needed.