[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2db40a7f-9463-49af-8600-73d735fd78bd@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:30:36 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
osalvador@...e.de, nao.horiguchi@...il.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
mhocko@...e.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm: memory-hotplug: check folio ref count first in
do_migrate_range
On 17.02.25 02:43, Wupeng Ma wrote:
> From: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@...wei.com>
>
> If a folio has an increased reference count, folio_try_get() will acquire
> it, perform necessary operations, and then release it. In the case of a
> poisoned folio without an elevated reference count (which is unlikely for
> memory-failure), folio_try_get() will simply bypass it.
>
> Therefore, relocate the folio_try_get() function, responsible for checking
> and acquiring this reference count at first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@...wei.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists