[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i-1C2GF=5VE5Bfq_znG1nVU6K5orzhOohBatc64ghX7mW6FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:20:56 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] x86/cpu: Enable modifying bug flags with {clear,set}puid
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 12:10, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> > extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
> > +#define x86_bug_flag(flag) x86_bug_flags[flag]
>
> Why?
That's just for consistency with x86_cap_flag().
I don't remember seeing any reason why that indirection exists. Maybe
it's vestigial. Shall I just remove it?
To everything else: ack, thanks for the review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists