lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i-1C2GF=5VE5Bfq_znG1nVU6K5orzhOohBatc64ghX7mW6FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:20:56 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] x86/cpu: Enable modifying bug flags with {clear,set}puid

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 12:10, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> >  extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
> > +#define x86_bug_flag(flag) x86_bug_flags[flag]
>
> Why?

That's just for consistency with x86_cap_flag().

I don't remember seeing any reason why that indirection exists. Maybe
it's vestigial. Shall I just remove it?

To everything else: ack, thanks for the review.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ