[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ab0afc3-dcfa-4ae8-a695-b8b3864c0a6e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:56:09 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kevin Chen <kevin_chen@...eedtech.com>, lee@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, joel@....id.au,
andrew@...econstruct.com.au, chiawei_wang@...eedtech.com,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-binding: aspeed: Add LPC PCC controller
On 17/02/2025 12:48, Kevin Chen wrote:
> Add dt-bindings for Aspeed for Aspeed LPC POST code capture controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Chen <kevin_chen@...eedtech.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-lpc.yaml | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
Nothing improved. You will not get different review.
Also, provide detailed changelog explaining how you fixed here
previously reported issues.
<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.
Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.
You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.
Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists