[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB7134F491D46892FD5669E3C589FA2@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 03:33:08 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 12:46 AM
> To: x86@...nel.org; Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-edac@...r.kernel.org;
> Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com; Yazen Ghannam
> <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init
>
> Currently on AMD systems, MCA interrupt handler functions are set during
> CPU init. However, the functions only need to be set once for the whole
> system.
>
> Assign the handlers only during BSP init. Do so only for SMCA systems to
> maintain the old behavior for legacy systems.
Looks like the interrupt handler is still set during each per-CPU online, right?
What's the benefit/purpose of this patch? Thanks!
mce_cpu_online(cpu)
mce_threshold_create_device(cpu) {
...
mce_threshold_vector = amd_threshold_interrupt;
...
}
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists