[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218134214.GY1615191@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:42:14 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: Kalesh Anakkur Purayil <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, shenjian15@...wei.com,
wangpeiyang1@...wei.com, liuyonglong@...wei.com,
chenhao418@...wei.com, sudongming1@...wei.com,
xujunsheng@...wei.com, shiyongbang@...wei.com, libaihan@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
salil.mehta@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: hibmcge: Add rx checksum offload
supported in this module
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:27:28PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>
> on 2025/2/18 10:46, Kalesh Anakkur Purayil wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 7:47 AM Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > on 2025/2/17 23:40, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:55:25AM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
> > > > > This patch implements the rx checksum offload feature
> > > > > including NETIF_F_IP_CSUM NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_RXCSUM
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hibmcge/hbg_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hibmcge/hbg_txrx.c
> > > > > index 8c631a9bcb6b..aa1d128a863b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hibmcge/hbg_txrx.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hibmcge/hbg_txrx.c
> > > > > @@ -202,8 +202,11 @@ static int hbg_napi_tx_recycle(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static bool hbg_rx_check_l3l4_error(struct hbg_priv *priv,
> > > > > - struct hbg_rx_desc *desc)
> > > > > + struct hbg_rx_desc *desc,
> > > > > + struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > > {
> > > > > + bool rx_checksum_offload = priv->netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> > > > nit: I think this would be better expressed in a way that
> > > > rx_checksum_offload is assigned a boolean value (completely untested).
> > > >
> > > > bool rx_checksum_offload = !!(priv->netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM);
> > > Okay, I'll modify it in v2.
> > Maybe you can remove " in this module" from the patch title as it is
> > implicit. This comment/suggestion applies to all patches in this
> > series.
>
> Sorry this may not have any bad effect,
> so I don't plan to change it in V2.
> If anyone else thinks it should be modified,
> I will modify it.
I agree that a shorter subject would be better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists