linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250218153138.GLZ7Sn2inSAgMo1aAM@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:31:38 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, nao.horiguchi@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
	hpa@...or.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/hwpoison: Fix regressions in memory failure
 handling

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 09:53:17PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> The regression is reported by end user and we also observed in the production.

Where is that report? How many times do I have to ask about different aspects
of your patches until you explain the *whole* picture?

> [5056863.064239] task: ffff8837d2a2a0c0 task.stack: ffffc90065814000
> [5056863.137299] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813ad231>]  [<ffffffff813ad231>] __get_user_8+0x21/0x2b
> ...
> [5056864.512018] Call Trace:

This tells me exactly 0 - I see some truncated stack trace.

> Sorry, I did not get your point.

I don't get your text either. Until this is explained and debugged properly,
it is not going anywhere.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette