[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5425dd93-988f-4a45-876d-6a81d6154a04@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:01:44 +0200
From: "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@...il.com>
CC: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3] net: e1000e: convert to
ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
On 2/18/2025 2:59 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 04:57:28PM +0100, Piotr Wejman wrote:
>> Update the driver to use the new hardware timestamping API added in commit
>> 66f7223039c0 ("net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping").
>> Use Netlink extack for error reporting in e1000e_config_hwtstamp.
>> Align the indentation of net_device_ops.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <wejmanpm@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -3932,7 +3939,11 @@ static void e1000e_systim_reset(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->systim_lock, flags);
>>
>> /* restore the previous hwtstamp configuration settings */
>> - e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config);
>> + ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config, &extack);
>
> nit: If there is a v4 for some other reason, please consider line-wrapping
> the above to avoid lines that are more than 80 columns wide.
>
> ret_val = e1000e_config_hwtstamp(adapter, &adapter->hwtstamp_config,
> &extack);
>
>> + if (ret_val) {
>> + if (extack._msg)
>> + e_err("%s\n", extack._msg);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -6079,8 +6090,8 @@ static int e1000_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int e1000_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
>> - int cmd)
>> +static int e1000_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr,
>> + int cmd)
>
> nit: And conversely, if there is a v4 for some other reason,
> please consider merging the above two lines into one.
>
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists