lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7446c987-3286-4b8a-a105-96443275d4d4@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:18:12 -0500
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Gupta, Suraj" <Suraj.Gupta2@....com>,
 "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: xilinx: axienet: Implement BQL

On 2/18/25 11:16, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > Could you please check if BQL can be implemented for DMAengine flow?
>> 
>> I can have a look, but TBH I do not test the dma engine configuration since it is
>> so much slower.
> 
> It might actually benefit more from BQL if it is slower?

Actually, it will benefit less. The hardware is the same, so the
slowdown is entirely due to extra CPU overhead. From the CPU's
perspective, the queues actually drain faster than normal.

--Sean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ