[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218112602.5611754e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:26:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mark
Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ftrace: Updates for v6.14
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:38:30 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:49:18 +0100
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
> > nop
> >
> > Bisected to commit 4346ba160409 ("fprobe: Rewrite fprobe on function-graph
> > tracer"). Before this commit there were no ftrace enabled functions after the
> > test suite finished:
> >
> > $ wc -l /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/enabled_functions
> > 0 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/enabled_functions
> >
> > This is on s390 with defconfig.
>
> Thanks, I can reproduce it on x86 (I didn't check that commit though).
>
> I'll take a look.
I think I found 3 different bugs in the accounting of what is registered
and what is not. I'll post a patch series shortly. Two in the function
graph tracer subops accounting, and one in the fprobe accounting.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists