[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218-browse-animator-50e846a616b0@spud>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:13:41 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Emil Gedenryd <emil.gedenryd@...s.com>,
Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@...tec.com>,
Mudit Sharma <muditsharma.info@...il.com>,
Per-Daniel Olsson <perdaniel.olsson@...s.com>,
Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>,
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: light: al3010: add al3000a
support
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 08:21:03AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> чт, 13 лют. 2025 р. о 22:15 Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> пише:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > ср, 12 лют. 2025 р. о 21:20 Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> пише:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 08:46:55AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > > > AL3000a is an ambient light sensor quite closely related to
> > > > > exising AL3010 and can re-use exising schema for AL3010.
> > > >
> > > > Quite close you say, but the driver is entirely different it seems. How
> > > > closely related is the hardware itself?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, I can simply duplicate al3010 or al3320a schema if re-using
> > > schema is not allowed. AL3000a has no available datasheet online.
> > > Downstream code for al3000a and al3010 seems to have same principles,
> > > apart from light measurements.
> >
> > It's probably more of a question as to why you're duplicating the driver
> > for them, rather than telling you not to put both bindings together.
> > That said, information on what's actually different is helpful in the
> > binding, to explain why you're not using a fallback compatible etc.
> >
>
> Quoting writing-bindings.rst:
> DON'T refer to Linux or "device driver" in bindings. Bindings should
> be based on what the hardware has, not what an OS and driver currently
> support.
No need to quite that back at me, I'm the one usually attempting to
enforce these things. I just expect more information about the
similiarties/differences when you're content splitting into two drivers
but want to reuse the same binding.
>
> From all available data, hw configuration of al3000a closely matches
> al3010 and seems to be part of same sensor lineup. It is not
> prohibited to add new compatibles to existing schema. Schema does not
> take in account way of processing data generated by sensor and this is
> the main difference between al3000a and al3010
Please mention this in your commit message.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists