[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAgsn0=_LjD1HovuN__fXanOOrOawatx5EhUmMn3KDYig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:24:14 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, qyousef@...alina.io, ke.wang@...soc.com,
di.shen@...soc.com, xuewen.yan94@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/uclamp: Add uclamp_is_used() check before
enable it
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:18, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com> wrote:
>
> Because the static_branch_enable() would get the cpus_read_lock(),
> and sometimes users may frequently set the uclamp value of tasks,
> and the uclamp_validate() would call the static_branch_enable()
> frequently, so add the uclamp_is_used() check to prevent calling
> the cpus_read_lock() frequently.
You should extended this to all calls to
static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used) which are cgroups and system
wide uclamp
Android likes to play with task's uclamp but the same could happen with others
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@...soc.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> index 456d339be98f..d718fddadb03 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,8 @@ static int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p,
> * blocking operation which obviously cannot be done while holding
> * scheduler locks.
> */
> - static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
> + if (!uclamp_is_used())
> + static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
may be use a helper function to encapsulate this and use it everywhere
we enable sched_uclamp_used
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists