[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218192250.296870-4-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:22:46 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Fix locking issues with the peer record hash
rxrpc_new_incoming_peer() can't use spin_lock_bh() whilst its caller has
interrupts disabled.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1550 at kernel/softirq.c:369 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x46/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b0/0x400
rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1dd/0x5e0
rxrpc_input_packet+0x84a/0x920
rxrpc_io_thread+0x40d/0xb40
kthread+0x2ec/0x300
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
irq event stamp: 1811
hardirqs last enabled at (1809): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (1810): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (1182): handle_softirqs+0x3ee/0x430
softirqs last disabled at (1811): rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x56/0x120
Fix this by using a plain spin_lock() instead. IRQs are held, so softirqs
can't happen.
Fixes: a2ea9a907260 ("rxrpc: Use irq-disabling spinlocks between app and I/O thread")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/peer_object.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
index 2ddc8ed68742..56e09d161a97 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
@@ -324,10 +324,10 @@ void rxrpc_new_incoming_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
hash_key = rxrpc_peer_hash_key(local, &peer->srx);
rxrpc_init_peer(local, peer, hash_key);
- spin_lock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
+ spin_lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
hash_add_rcu(rxnet->peer_hash, &peer->hash_link, hash_key);
list_add_tail(&peer->keepalive_link, &rxnet->peer_keepalive_new);
- spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists