lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3a8816c-3846-83ab-9750-fd12041d9495@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:25:38 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        Nathan
 Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Ben
 Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kbuild: slim down package for building external
 modules

On 7/27/2024 1:42 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Exclude directories and files unnecessary for building external modules:
> 
>   - include/config/  (except include/config/auto.conf)
>   - scripts/atomic/
>   - scripts/dtc/
>   - scripts/kconfig/
>   - scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
>   - scripts/package/
>   - scripts/unifdef
>   - .config

Please revert this (the removal of .config).

I got some strange reports that our external module install broke, and 
traced it to this change.  Our external module references the .config 
because we have different logic for the build depending on if other, 
related modules are present or not.

Also, it looks like this broke DKMS for some configurations, which not 
only impacts DKMS itself [1] but also downstream projects [2].

While DKMS may be updated going forward to avoid this issue, there are 
plenty of affected version out in the wild.

Also, I haven't surveyed every distro, but it looks like Ubuntu still 
packages the .config with their headers in their upcoming "Plucky" 
release based on 6.12.  I suspect they wouldn't do that if they didn't 
feel it was needed/useful.

-Jeff

[1]: https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/464
[2]: https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/issues/1654

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ