linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] module: Add module_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250218162942.5267a002@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:29:42 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark
 Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Sami
 Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
 linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] module: Add module_for_each_mod() function

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:21:20 -0800
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:


> > Luis,
> > 
> > Is this patch OK, and also is there any plan to move the module code to
> > using just rcu_read_lock instead of preempt_disable?  
> 
> The patch is not OK, you're looking at old code, look at
> modules-next and as Petr suggested look at Sebastian's recently
> merged work.
> 
> git remote add korg-modules git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git

Ha! Some how I missed seeing the two replies from Petr and Sebastian!

Not sure how that happened.  Something may be going wacky with claws-mail. :-/

Thanks for pointing them out. I'll definitely take a look.

-- Steve