linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] perf report: Add latency and parallelism profiling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aWmc7fZuXKSVPj+dZ4DBOYHYHfCFq9fpmdKeD-QMsvPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 07:27:59 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, acme@...nel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] perf report: Add latency and parallelism profiling

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 19:05, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:08:13AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > There are two notions of time: wall-clock time and CPU time.
> > For a single-threaded program, or a program running on a single-core
> > machine, these notions are the same. However, for a multi-threaded/
> > multi-process program running on a multi-core machine, these notions are
> > significantly different. Each second of wall-clock time we have
> > number-of-cores seconds of CPU time.
>
> I read through it and it looks good to me.
>
> For the patchkit.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks for the review!

Namhyung, Arnaldo, what's left for this series to be merged?