[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218080830.ufw3IgyX@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:08:30 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, kw@...ux.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com,
robh@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kbusch@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4] PCI: vmd: Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t.
From: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
The access to the PCI config space via pci_ops::read and pci_ops::write
is a low-level hardware access. The functions can be accessed with
disabled interrupts even on PREEMPT_RT. The pci_lock has been made a
raw_spinlock_t for this purpose. A spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on
PREEMPT_RT can not be acquired with disabled interrupts.
The vmd_dev::cfg_lock is accessed in the same context as the pci_lock.
Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t.
[bigeasy: Reword commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
Tested-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
Changes since v3 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241219014549.24427-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com/
- Repost with updated changelog.
Changes since v2 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241218115951.83062-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com/
- In case if CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG is set, vmd_pci_read/write()
still neeed cfg_lock for their serialization. So instead of removing
it, convert it to raw spinlock.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241215141321.383144-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com/
drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index 9d9596947350f..94ceec50a2b94 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct vmd_irq_list {
struct vmd_dev {
struct pci_dev *dev;
- spinlock_t cfg_lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t cfg_lock;
void __iomem *cfgbar;
int msix_count;
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
if (!addr)
return -EFAULT;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
switch (len) {
case 1:
*value = readb(addr);
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
if (!addr)
return -EFAULT;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
switch (len) {
case 1:
writeb(value, addr);
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
if (features & VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR)
vmd->first_vec = 1;
- spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
pci_set_drvdata(dev, vmd);
err = vmd_enable_domain(vmd, features);
if (err)
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists