[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24a61833-f389-b074-0d9c-d5ad9efc2046@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:02:22 +0800
From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de
Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "Liang,
Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Add Morton,Peter and David for discussion//Re: [PATCH -next]
uprobes: fix two zero old_folio bugs in __replace_page()
在 2025/2/18 16:23, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 18.02.25 03:47, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2025/2/17 20:38, Tong Tiangen 写道:
>>> We triggered the following error logs in syzkaller test:
>>>
>>> BUG: Bad page state in process syz.7.38 pfn:1eff3
>>> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
>>> pfn:0x1eff3
>>> flags:
>>> 0x3fffff00004004(referenced|reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
>>> raw: 003fffff00004004 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set
>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
>>> 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
>>> Call Trace:
>>> <TASK>
>>> dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
>>> bad_page+0x69/0xf0
>>> free_unref_page_prepare+0x401/0x500
>>> free_unref_page+0x6d/0x1b0
>>> uprobe_write_opcode+0x460/0x8e0
>>> install_breakpoint.part.0+0x51/0x80
>>> register_for_each_vma+0x1d9/0x2b0
>>> __uprobe_register+0x245/0x300
>>> bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x29b/0x4f0
>>> link_create+0x1e2/0x280
>>> __sys_bpf+0x75f/0xac0
>>> __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30
>>> do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2
>>>
>>> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000452453e0 type:MM_FILEPAGES
>>> val:-1
>>>
>>> The following syzkaller test case can be used to reproduce:
>>>
>>> r2 = creat(&(0x7f0000000000)='./file0\x00', 0x8)
>>> write$nbd(r2, &(0x7f0000000580)=ANY=[], 0x10)
>>> r4 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00',
>>> 0x42, 0x0)
>>> mmap$IORING_OFF_SQ_RING(&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000,
>>> 0x0, 0x12, r4, 0x0)
>>> r5 = userfaultfd(0x80801)
>>> ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r5, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000040)={0xaa, 0x20})
>>> r6 = userfaultfd(0x80801)
>>> ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r6, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000140))
>>> ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r6, 0xc020aa00,
>>> &(0x7f0000000100)={{&(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000}, 0x2})
>>> ioctl$UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE(r5, 0xc020aa04,
>>> &(0x7f0000000000)={{&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000}})
>>> r7 = bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x2, 0x3,
>>> &(0x7f0000000200)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000120000000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000000)='GPL\x00',
>>> 0x7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, @fallback=0x30,
>>> 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
>>> 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, @void, @value}, 0x94)
>>> bpf$BPF_LINK_CREATE_XDP(0x1c, &(0x7f0000000040)={r7, 0x0, 0x30,
>>> 0x1e, @val=@...obe_multi={&(0x7f0000000080)='./file0\x00',
>>> &(0x7f0000000100)=[0x2], 0x0, 0x0, 0x1}}, 0x40)
>>>
>>> The cause is that zero pfn is set to the pte without increasing the rss
>>> count in mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage() and the refcount of zero folio does
>>> not increase accordingly. Then, the operation on the same pfn is
>>> performed
>>> in uprobe_write_opcode()->__replace_page() to unconditional decrease the
>>> rss count and old_folio's refcount.
>>>
>>> Therefore, two bugs are introduced:
>>> 1. The rss count is incorrect, when process exit, the check_mm() report
>>> error "Bad rss-count".
>>> 2. The reserved folio (zero folio) is freed when folio->refcount is
>>> zero,
>>> then free_pages_prepare->free_page_is_bad() report error "Bad
>>> page state".
>>>
>>> To fix it, add zero folio check before rss counter and refcount
>>> decrease.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7396fa818d62 ("uprobes/core: Make background page replacement
>>> logic account for rss_stat counters")
>>> Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install
>>> and remove uprobes breakpoints")
>>> Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>>> index 46ddf3a2334d..ff5694acfa68 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
>>> @@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ static int __replace_page(struct vm_area_struct
>>> *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>> dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
>>> if (!folio_test_anon(old_folio)) {
>>> - dec_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(old_folio));
>>> + if (!is_zero_folio(old_folio))
>>> + dec_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(old_folio));
>>> inc_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
>>> }
>>> @@ -227,7 +228,8 @@ static int __replace_page(struct vm_area_struct
>>> *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>> if (!folio_mapped(old_folio))
>>> folio_free_swap(old_folio);
>>> page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>>> - folio_put(old_folio);
>>> + if (!is_zero_folio(old_folio))
>>> + folio_put(old_folio);
> >> >> err = 0;
>>> unlock:
>>
>
> The whole "manually replace pages" logic is fragile. I tried to rewrite
> it a while back:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240604122548.359952-1-david@redhat.com
>
> But didn't get to follow-up yet.
>
> I'm not sure if the page_vma_mapped_walk() really does what we would
> expect here.
>
> The folio_remove_rmap_pte(old_folio, old_page, vma); is certainly wrong
> as well for ero folios.
>
>
> I don't think there is a sane use case right now where we would hit the
> shared zeropage.
>
> So for the time being, I think we should just reject them immediately
> after get_user_page_vma_remote().
>
> At some point I'll follow up with my rewrite that will clean this
> nastiness here up a bit.
OK, Before your rewrite last merged, How about i change the solution to
just reject them immediately after get_user_page_vma_remote()?
Thanks,
Tong.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists