[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e7bc52b-332d-475e-94ca-571864cb1a6a@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:15:37 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@...iatek.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Deren Wu <deren.wu@...iatek.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix error checking in
mt7925_mcu_uni_rx/tx_ba()
Ping.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:46:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "ret" variable in mt7925_mcu_uni_[rx/tx]_ba() needs to be signed for
> the if (ret < 0) condition to be true.
>
> Also the mt7925_mcu_sta_ba() function returns positive values on success.
> The code currently returns whatever non-negative value was returned on
> the last iteration. It would be better to return zero on success. This
> function is called from mt7925_ampdu_action() which does not check the
> return value so the return value doesn't affect runtime. However, it
> still makes sense to return zero even though nothing is affected in the
> current code.
>
> Fixes: eb2a9a12c609 ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> index 15815ad84713..b3a00964e802 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c
> @@ -617,7 +617,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
> unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif);
> struct mt76_wcid *wcid;
> - u8 link_id, ret;
> + u8 link_id;
> + int ret;
>
> for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
> mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id);
> @@ -630,10 +631,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params,
> enable, true);
> if (ret < 0)
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> @@ -647,7 +648,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf;
> unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif);
> struct mt76_wcid *wcid;
> - u8 link_id, ret;
> + u8 link_id;
> + int ret;
>
> for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) {
> mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id);
> @@ -657,10 +659,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev,
> ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params,
> enable, false);
> if (ret < 0)
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int mt7925_load_clc(struct mt792x_dev *dev, const char *fw_name)
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists