[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bb3354c-7f77-b07f-55b2-ac3bf5159532@applied-asynchrony.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:55:16 +0100
From: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/230] 6.12.16-rc1 review
On 2025-02-19 14:32, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2025 13:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:12:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> On 19/02/2025 13:10, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:25:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.16 release.
>>>>> There are 230 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:25:11 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.16-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>
>>>> Failures detected for Tegra ...
>>>>
>>>> Test results for stable-v6.12:
>>>> 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
>>>> 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
>>>> 116 tests: 115 pass, 1 fail
>>>>
>>>> Linux version: 6.12.16-rc1-gcf505a9aecb7
>>>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>>> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>>>> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>>>> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>>
>>>> Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
>>>
>>>
>>> The following appear to have crept in again ...
>>>
>>> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>>> sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug
>>>
>>> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
>>> sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated bandwidth during hotplug
>>
>> Yes, but all of them are there this time. Are you saying none should be
>> there? Does 6.14-rc work for you with these targets?
> The 1st one definitely shouldn't. That one is still under debug for
> v6.14 [0]. I can try reverting only that one and seeing if it now
> passes with the 2nd.
Most certainly not - you need all three or none:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/905eb8ab-2635-e030-b671-ab045b55f24c@applied-asynchrony.com/
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/ba51a43f-796d-4b79-808a-b8185905638a@nvidia.com/
I was about to link to that.. please try 6.14-rc and see if it works for you.
Alternatively we should remove the whole series again because it's obvious that
_something_ is still wrong somewhere. Maybe something specific to Tegra's topology?
-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists