linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ntsync: Check wait count based on byte size.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025021906-retainer-trustless-bd1d@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:25:27 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	wine-devel@...ehq.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntsync: Check wait count based on byte size.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:19:20PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> GCC versions below 13 incorrectly detect the copy size as being static and too
> small to fit in the "fds" array. Work around this by explicitly calculating the
> size and returning EINVAL based on that, instead of based on the object count.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502072019.LYoCR9bF-lkp@intel.com/
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> --
> 
> Suggested-by as per Arnd's request, but the only thing I changed was preserving
> array_size() [as noted by Geert in the linked thread]. I tested and found no
> regressions.

You forgot to sign-off on this commit :(

Can you resend it please with that fixed?

thanks,

greg k-h