[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3795f3b-8d38-40cd-abcc-723b18d6dc70@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:41:24 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] media: rcar: Streams support
Hi,
On 19/02/2025 16:22, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> I'm happy to see this, nice work.
>
> Unfortunately it does not apply to the media-tree. As this series is a
It should, if you apply the dependencies first. But one of the
dependencies from you is a bit old and that doesn't apply without some
conflicts resolved. So... Yes, doesn't apply =).
> mix of fixes and new features as well as covering multiple drivers. Do
> you think it would make sens to break out the fixes per driver which we
> could review and apply ASAP and the new features which we can review but
> need to wait until the dependencies are meet?
Yes. I think that's the RAW8 and RAW10 fixes. However, I can't test them
without streams and GMSL2, so...
> If the new features depends on stuff that is hard to upport, maybe just
> focus on the fixes to get them out of the way?
>
> On 2025-02-19 15:48:54 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Add streams support to Renesas rcar platform driver.
>>
>> The series attempts to keep compatibility with the current upstream.
>> However, in upstream there's some kind of custom multi-stream support
>> implemented to the rcar driver, which breaks at patch "media: rcar-csi2:
>> Simplify rcsi2_calc_mbps()".
>
> I would not worry about breaking the make shift multi-stream, it was
> based on our first attempt to allow streams for GMSL many years ago and
> it was bonkers ;-) As long as it don't break a single streams, even from
> subdevs that do not themself support streams I'm happy.
Alright. Then you're happy with this series. I hope =). I don't have
anything to test this with, and only the v4h board.
Tomi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists