[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7484ab2-6da0-4bb9-a2ae-9388dac15038@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:43:37 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"D . Jeff Dionne" <jeff@...esemi.io>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip: clocksource: fix jcore-pit irq request
On 16/02/2025 18:55, Artur Rojek wrote:
> The jcore-aic irqchip does not have separate interrupt numbers reserved
> for cpu-local vs global interrupts. Instead, the task of selecting this
> property is being delegated to the device drivers requesting the given
> irq.
>
> This quirk has not been taken into account while migrating jcore-pit to
> request_percpu_irq(), resulting in a failure to register PIT interrupts.
>
> Fix this behavior by making the following changes:
> 1) Explicitly register irq_set_percpu_devid() in jcore-pit.
> 2) Provide enable_percpu_irq()/disable_percpu_irq() calls in jcore-pit.
> 3) Make jcore-aic pass the correct per-cpu cookie to the irq handler by
> using handle_percpu_devid_irq() instead of handle_percpu_irq().
>
> Fixes: 69a9dcbd2d65 ("clocksource/drivers/jcore: Use request_percpu_irq()")
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
> ---
How this patch should be merged ?
It is touching irqchip and clocksource at the same time.
May I pick it in the clocksource tree ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists