lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219145620.GB515486@ragnatech.se>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:56:20 +0100
From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] media: rcar: Streams support

On 2025-02-19 16:41:24 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 19/02/2025 16:22, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > Hi Tomi,
> > 
> > I'm happy to see this, nice work.
> > 
> > Unfortunately it does not apply to the media-tree. As this series is a
> 
> It should, if you apply the dependencies first. But one of the dependencies
> from you is a bit old and that doesn't apply without some conflicts
> resolved. So... Yes, doesn't apply =).

:-)

> 
> > mix of fixes and new features as well as covering multiple drivers. Do
> > you think it would make sens to break out the fixes per driver which we
> > could review and apply ASAP and the new features which we can review but
> > need to wait until the dependencies are meet?
> 
> Yes. I think that's the RAW8 and RAW10 fixes. However, I can't test them
> without streams and GMSL2, so...

Sure but the fixes for the format setup registers don't depend on 
streams support, right? The fixes are properly tested but depend on new 
features to enable hardware to produce the test environment. It's miles 
better then the BSP testing done when these things where first 
written...

> 
> > If the new features depends on stuff that is hard to upport, maybe just
> > focus on the fixes to get them out of the way?
> > 
> > On 2025-02-19 15:48:54 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > Add streams support to Renesas rcar platform driver.
> > > 
> > > The series attempts to keep compatibility with the current upstream.
> > > However, in upstream there's some kind of custom multi-stream support
> > > implemented to the rcar driver, which breaks at patch "media: rcar-csi2:
> > > Simplify rcsi2_calc_mbps()".
> > 
> > I would not worry about breaking the make shift multi-stream, it was
> > based on our first attempt to allow streams for GMSL many years ago and
> > it was bonkers ;-) As long as it don't break a single streams, even from
> > subdevs that do not themself support streams I'm happy.
> 
> Alright. Then you're happy with this series. I hope =). I don't have
> anything to test this with, and only the v4h board.

You can test single stream on V4H using the staging GMSL2 driver and the 
TPG. I will ofc also test it so no need if it's troublesome for you to 
rewire the V4H you have to this configuration.

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ