[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7X9JIDVMorYGuS1@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:47:48 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Drop unused passive
thermal trip points for CPU
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:36:21PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> There are currently two passive trip points defined for the CPU, but no
> cooling devices are attached to the thermal zones. We don't have support
> for cpufreq upstream yet, but actually this is redundant anyway because the
> CPU is throttled automatically when reaching high temperatures.
>
> Drop the passive trip points and keep just the critical shutdown as safety
> measure in case the throttling fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Looks good. Perhaps we should backport this one as well in case the
current passive trip points cause unnecessary work to done for no
reason.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists