linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1] 6.1.129-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1739989828-11367-1-git-send-email-hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:30:28 -0800
From: Hardik Garg <hargar@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	conor@...nel.org,
	f.fainelli@...il.com,
	hargar@...rosoft.com,
	jonathanh@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...nelci.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	pavel@...x.de,
	rwarsow@....de,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	srw@...dewatkins.net,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1] 6.1.129-rc1 review

The kernel, bpf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.1.129-rc1 on x86 Azure VM.

perf build fails with the following error:
CC      util/trace-event-parse.o
util/namespaces.c: In function 'nsinfo__set_in_pidns':
util/namespaces.c:247:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'RC_CHK_ACCESS' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  247 |         RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->in_pidns = true;
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/namespaces.c:247:27: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
  247 |         RC_CHK_ACCESS(nsi)->in_pidns = true;
      |                           ^~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [/home/hgarg2/upstream-kernel/linux-stable-rc/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: util/namespaces.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  CC      tests/unit_number__scnprintf.o


Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@...ux.microsoft.com>




Thanks,
Hardik