linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cxl/core: Use guard() to replace open-coded down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7YV6X-ipaQeJrrn@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:33:29 -0800
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>
Cc: dave@...olabs.net, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
	vishal.l.verma@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cxl/core: Use guard() to replace open-coded
 down_read/write()

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:48:22PM +0800, Li Ming wrote:
> Some down/up_read() and down/up_write() cases can be replaced by a
> guard() simply to drop explicit unlock invoked. It helps to align coding
> style with current CXL subsystem's.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>

snip