linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: qup: Vote for interconnect bandwidth to DRAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bhm7ydwoed7lufnjzwtfipmqpbyc2phun5rh7cinwogbpmscp6@s2ulyfqstlro>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:36:47 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>, 
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: qup: Vote for interconnect bandwidth to DRAM

Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 08:00:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/02/2025 00:02, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > sorry for the very late reply here. Just one question.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> downstream/vendor driver [1]. Due to lack of documentation about the
> >> interconnect setup/behavior I cannot say exactly if this is right.
> >> Unfortunately, this is not implemented very consistently downstream...
> > 
> > Can we have someone from Qualcomm or Linaro taking a peak here?
> 
> You replied to some old email, not in my inbox anymore,

feeling nostalgic :-)

> but your quote
> lacks standard quote-template, like:
> 
> 	On 19/02/2025 00:02, Andi Shyti wrote:

I'm strictly following RFC-1855, but you're right I removed a bit
too much to lose time reference.

> so I really don't know when was it sent. For sure more than a month ago,
> maybe more? This has to be resent if you want anything done here.

It was sent on "Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:48:34 +0100", definitely more
than a month ago, I'm also surprised to have it in my inbox. But
it still applies cleanly.

Perhaps a resend can invite people for more reviews. I don't
mind.

Thanks,
Andi