[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8923aaae-becd-489a-bfe1-8c1c569d8d48@web.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:10:53 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix potential use-after-free with cfs bandwidth
…
> For full correctness, we should avoid removal from the list until after
> we're done unthrottling in __cfsb_csd_unthrottle().
…
How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc3#n145
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists