[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e46e0f9-ef0d-406f-9fa9-9c4464a8db88@web.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:56:31 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dingxian Wen <shawn.wen@...k-chips.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Nelson Costa <Nelson.Costa@...opsys.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
Tim Surber <me@...surber.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] media: platform: synopsys: Add support for HDMI
input driver
…
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/synopsys/hdmirx/snps_hdmirx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2718 @@
…
> +static u32 hdmirx_readl(struct snps_hdmirx_dev *hdmirx_dev, int reg)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&hdmirx_dev->rst_lock);
> +
> + val = readl(hdmirx_dev->regs + reg);
> +
> + return val;
> +}
May such a function implementation be simplified?
{
guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&hdmirx_dev->rst_lock);
return readl(hdmirx_dev->regs + reg);
}
…
> +static int hdmirx_get_detected_timings(struct snps_hdmirx_dev *hdmirx_dev,
> + struct v4l2_dv_timings *timings)
> +{
…
> + mutex_lock(&hdmirx_dev->work_lock);
> +retry:
> + memset(timings, 0, sizeof(struct v4l2_dv_timings));
…
> + mutex_unlock(&hdmirx_dev->work_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
…
Would you become interested to apply a statement like “guard(mutex)(&hdmirx_dev->work_lock);”?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc3/source/include/linux/mutex.h#L201
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists