[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219220826.2453186-3-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:08:22 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] x86/mm: Remove X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB checks in cond_mitigation()
The check is performed when either switch_mm_cond_ibpb or
switch_mm_always_ibpb is set. In both cases, X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB is
always set. Remove the redundant check.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index be0c1a509869c..e860fc8edfae4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -437,8 +437,7 @@ static void cond_mitigation(struct task_struct *next)
* both have the IBPB bit set.
*/
if (next_mm != prev_mm &&
- (next_mm | prev_mm) & LAST_USER_MM_IBPB &&
- cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB))
+ (next_mm | prev_mm) & LAST_USER_MM_IBPB)
indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
}
@@ -448,8 +447,7 @@ static void cond_mitigation(struct task_struct *next)
* different context than the user space task which ran
* last on this CPU.
*/
- if ((prev_mm & ~LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK) != (unsigned long)next->mm &&
- cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB))
+ if ((prev_mm & ~LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK) != (unsigned long)next->mm)
indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
}
--
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists