[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXCzwWOJMTfxDToSxsr9Ox9KjXtNXkpLhdS5CpSzG4RUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:32:12 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>,
Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Jean-Philippe Romain <jean-philippe.romain@...s.st.com>, Junhao He <hejunhao3@...wei.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Bodkhe <Aditya.Bodkhe1@....com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
Beeman Strong <beeman@...osinc.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] perf parse-events: Reapply "Prefer sysfs/JSON
hardware events over legacy"
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 3:22 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> I'm ok with preferring JSON over sysfs. In general I think they don't
> have the same event names unless you want to override one.
Thanks Namhyung. I'm not clear, what's the plan for this patch series?
I know the clean up parts of it were applied. Are there any actions on
me? Are there people to solicit feedback from?
Thanks,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists