[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219185531.1140c3c4@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:55:31 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andrew
Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Joel
Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>, Anna Schumaker
<anna.schumaker@...cle.com>, Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, Kent
Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Yongliang Gao
<leonylgao@...cent.com>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, Sergey
Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux
Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hung_task: Show the blocker task if the task is
hung on mutex
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:56:39 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >> this field, we don't need to take lock, though taking the wait_lock may
> > >> still be needed to examine other information inside the mutex.
>
> Do we need to take it just for accessing owner, which is in an atomic?
Updating the task_struct would be in the same location as the blocked_on is
anyway. I would make it into a wrapper function that is a nop when disabled.
>
> > > But perhaps if we add a new config option for this feature, we could just
> > > add the lock that a task is blocked on before it goes to sleep and
> > > reference that instead. That would be easier than trying to play games
> > > getting the lock owner from the blocked_on field.
> >
> > Yes, it could be a new config option. This will be a useful feature that
> > I believe most distros will turn it on. Or we may just include that in
> > the core code without any option.
>
> Do we need another option? or just extend DETECT_HUNG_TASK?
DETECT_HUNG_TASK is just that, for detecting hung tasks. This adds more
information to that, which increases the size of the task_struct not to
mention adds code in the mutex/rwsem handlers.
I would definitely make it a separate config that may depend on
DETECT_HUNG_TASK.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists