[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219-garnet-gorilla-of-will-6e389e-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:41:24 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Dimitri Fedrau via B4 Relay <devnull+dimitri.fedrau.liebherr.com@...nel.org>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>,
Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: flexcan: add transceiver capabilities
On 11.02.2025 14:12:34, Dimitri Fedrau via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
>
> Currently the flexcan driver does not support adding PHYs. Add the
> capability to ensure that the PHY is in operational state when the link
> is set to an "up" state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> index ac1a860986df69a1dd64c25ff879490d5b21073b..a03dc8e3c80546a0e2fa9a85f0e0cc8159afa4f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>
> #include "flexcan.h"
>
> @@ -634,18 +635,22 @@ static void flexcan_clks_disable(const struct flexcan_priv *priv)
>
> static inline int flexcan_transceiver_enable(const struct flexcan_priv *priv)
> {
> - if (!priv->reg_xceiver)
> - return 0;
> + if (priv->reg_xceiver)
> + return regulator_enable(priv->reg_xceiver);
> + else if (priv->xceiver)
> + return phy_power_on(priv->xceiver);
>
> - return regulator_enable(priv->reg_xceiver);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static inline int flexcan_transceiver_disable(const struct flexcan_priv *priv)
> {
> - if (!priv->reg_xceiver)
> - return 0;
> + if (priv->reg_xceiver)
> + return regulator_disable(priv->reg_xceiver);
> + else if (priv->xceiver)
> + return phy_power_off(priv->xceiver);
>
> - return regulator_disable(priv->reg_xceiver);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int flexcan_chip_enable(struct flexcan_priv *priv)
> @@ -2061,6 +2066,7 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct net_device *dev;
> struct flexcan_priv *priv;
> struct regulator *reg_xceiver;
> + struct phy *xceiver;
> struct clk *clk_ipg = NULL, *clk_per = NULL;
> struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs;
> struct flexcan_platform_data *pdata;
> @@ -2076,6 +2082,12 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> else if (IS_ERR(reg_xceiver))
> return PTR_ERR(reg_xceiver);
>
> + xceiver = devm_phy_optional_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(xceiver)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get phy\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(xceiver);
> + }
> +
> if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> "clock-frequency", &clock_freq);
> @@ -2173,6 +2185,7 @@ static int flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> priv->clk_per = clk_per;
> priv->clk_src = clk_src;
> priv->reg_xceiver = reg_xceiver;
> + priv->xceiver = xceiver;
>
> if (priv->devtype_data.quirks & FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3) {
> priv->irq_boff = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
please also add
if (xceiver)
priv->can.bitrate_max = xceiver->attrs.max_link_rate;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan.h b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan.h
> index 4933d8c7439e62b5d6fcc445d88c2b5ccbfa13bb..56be40875eee24aee9297c4bc7c2fc4380e682ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct flexcan_priv {
> struct clk *clk_per;
> struct flexcan_devtype_data devtype_data;
> struct regulator *reg_xceiver;
> + struct phy *xceiver;
All other drivers name this variable "transceiver", does it make sense
to use this name here, too?
> struct flexcan_stop_mode stm;
>
> int irq_boff;
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists