[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219105326.GA31383@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:53:26 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Sasha Finkelstein <fnkl.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: dt-bindings: Add Apple ISP
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:54:31AM +0100, Sasha Finkelstein wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 10:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > +
> > > + apple,platform-id:
> > > + description: Platform id for firmware
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >
> >
> > No, use firmware-name.
>
> Not sure how is firmware-name an appropriate field, fw-name is a string
> that references a firmware file, while this field is an id that is sent to the
> coprocessor firmware in order to identify the platform.
>
> > > + apple,temporal-filter:
> > > + description: Whether temporal filter should be enabled in firmware
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >
> > And why is this not enabled always? Why this is board specific?
>
> Not every board has support for this feature.
>
> > You miss here ports or port. ISP usually gets signal from some camera or
> > other block.
>
> For complex cameras - yes, but this is closer to a UVC camera connected
> via a bespoke protocol. We do not need to deal with the sensor access,
> all of it is managed by the coprocessor firmware.
>
> > > + properties:
> > > + apple,config-index:
> > > + description: Firmware config index
> > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >
> >
> > No duplicated indices. You have reg for this, assuming this is index.
>
> There are duplicated indices, see isp-imx248.dtsi in patch 5 for an example.
>
> > All these do not look like hardware properties but rather configuration
> > of sensor which should be done runtime by OS, not by DT.
>
> Those are board-specific and not discoverable via the ISP protocol.
But they are settable through the ISP protocol, aren't they ? For
instance, looking at isp-imx248.dtsi, the first four entries are
/* 1280x720 */
preset0 {
apple,config-index = <0>;
apple,input-size = <1296 736>;
apple,output-size = <1280 720>;
apple,crop = <8 8 1280 720>;
};
/* 960x720 (4:3) */
preset1 {
apple,config-index = <0>;
apple,input-size = <1296 736>;
apple,output-size = <960 720>;
apple,crop = <168 8 960 720>;
};
/* 960x540 (16:9) */
preset2 {
apple,config-index = <0>;
apple,input-size = <1296 736>;
apple,output-size = <960 540>;
apple,crop = <8 8 1280 720>;
};
/* 640x480 (4:3) */
preset3 {
apple,config-index = <0>;
apple,input-size = <1296 736>;
apple,output-size = <640 480>;
apple,crop = <168 8 960 720>;
};
But I may be interested in capturing a 640x480 frame with cropping only
and without scaling, with
input-size = 1296x736
output-size = 640x480
crop = (328,128)/640x480
Or I may want my cropped frame to be located in the upper-left corner:
input-size = 1296x736
output-size = 640x480
crop = (8,8)/640x480
If I set those parameters through the ISP protocol, won't it work ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists