[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219112254.28691-1-suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:52:54 +0530
From: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
To: corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] docs: scheduler: fix spelling in sched-bwc documentation
Fix spelling of "interference" in the CFS bandwidth control documentation.
The word was misspelled as "interferenece".
Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
index 41ed2ceafc92..e881a945c188 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ At the same time, we can say that the worst case deadline miss, will be
\Sum e_i; that is, there is a bounded tardiness (under the assumption
that x+e is indeed WCET).
-The interferenece when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
+The interference when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
missing the deadline and the average WCET. Test results showed that when
there many cgroups or CPU is under utilized, the interference is
limited. More details are shown in:
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists