[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250219125522.2535263-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:55:18 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/4] posix-timers: Reduce spinlock contention
We had incidents involving gazillions of concurrent posix timers.
In this series, I am reducing hash_lock contention in posix_timer_add(),
and fix a possible race.
v2: Initialize timer->it_id and timer->it_signal to non zero values
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250214135911.2037402-1-edumazet@google.com/
Eric Dumazet (4):
posix-timers: Make next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t
posix-timers: Initialise timer->it_id in posix_timer_add()
posix-timers: Initialise timer->it_signal in posix_timer_add()
posix-timers: Use RCU in posix_timer_add()
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 +-
kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists